Image
The Saline Police Department provided the basis for these reports after they were found in the CLEMIS database.
Assault, Resistance Charges Possible
An 18-year-old woman faces charges after an incident on the 700 block of Valley Circle Drive., On Feb. 2, a woman called 911 and hung up. Dispatched called back and talked to the woman, who said she was having trouble with her daughter. Police arrived. The case is remains open and the daughter face resistance and assault charges. Police said full details could not be released.
Disorderly Conduct on Russell Street
Saline Police responded to a disorderly conduct situation on the 400 block of West Russell Street. A man reportedly yelled at his mother for 15 minutes. The case was turned over to the prosecutor's office for breach of peace. Police said they couldn't reveal much information because the case was still open.
Intimidation Allegation Nets Warning
A man has been warned by police to have no further contact with a Saline resident. The Saline man contacted police to report that he'd received threatening emails and texts from an ex-employee's husband. The alleged victim said he did not want to press charges. The report is dated Jan. 27.
"Unknown Crash" Could be Bring Charge
Saline Police were called to the area of of Maple Oaks Court and North Maple Road for a reported "unknown crash" and possible disorderly person. The incident occurred around 3:28 p.m., Feb. 3. The situation is "sensitive," police said. An operating while impaired case remains open and has been sent to the prosecutor's office.
Sunny, with a high of 83 and low of 53 degrees. Sunny in the morning, clear overnight.
Appreciate the interest in serving Saline. At this point, looks as though he will win by acclimation. Wonder what would happen if there were more candidates than spots. Without understanding why, it would be difficult to support a candidate who withdrew their interest then popped back in last minute.
As you can see by the picture, Bret is active in the city events and gives countless hours to his community.
Apparently no one can work with the current mayor?
We see that a little differently. Plenty of folks who are working just fine with the current Mayor. Unfortunately, there are others who are small in number yet loud and vocal who seem to delight in spreading unfounded and ridiculous allegations and rumors, and not just regarding the Mayor.
Nice of the attorneys to clarify this language at this point rather than having the foresight to understand that language should never have been in the agreement to start with!
Perhaps the Township should have sought counsel from an attorney not involved in the original contract negotiations (and perhaps they did - do not know) before changing direction.
Final thought - perhaps the attorney(s) working with the Township on the agreement can provide an explanation as to why that language HAD to be as represented in the final version of the agreement/why protections against exactly what has happened were not put in place.