Image

The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) invites the public to attend a virtual public meeting on the traffic noise analysis and updated draft technical report for the planned US-23 and US-12 (Michigan Avenue) improvement project in Pittsfield Township, Washtenaw County. During this virtual meeting, there will be a brief presentation followed by a question-and-answer session.
The meeting is at 5 p.m., Tuesday, Jan. 25.
Click here to join the Microsoft Teams Public Meeting
To listen by phone without using Internet, please call 248-509-0316.
Conference 778 857 962#
The US-23 and US-12 (Michigan Avenue) improvement project includes new travel lanes on US-12 (Michigan Avenue) in both directions beginning just west of the Pittsfield Township police station and extending across US-23 to Carpenter Road, plus redesigned intersections and a new right-turn lane from eastbound US-12 (Michigan Avenue) to southbound Platt Road.
At the US-23/US-12 (Michigan Avenue) interchange, new loop ramps are being added in the northwest and southeast quadrants to eliminate left-turn movements onto US-23. An auxiliary lane is being added in both directions on US-23 between I-94 and US-12 (Michigan Avenue), and the acceleration/de-acceleration lanes south of US-12 (Michigan Avenue) are being extended.
You can find information on the project attached below.
Public comment:
Please provide concerns and comments regarding the revised noise analysis using the online comment form or by mail, e-mail or phone to MDOT Public Involvement and Hearings Officer Monica Monsma at MonsmaM@Michigan.gov or:
Monica Monsma
MDOT Environmental Services Section
425 West Ottawa St.
P.O. Box 30050
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-4381
Pittsfield Township
Ann Arbor, MI
United States
Moderate rain, with a high of 89 and low of 71 degrees. Partly Cloudy during the morning, thundery outbreaks in nearby during the afternoon, mist in the evening,
Perhaps we are missing something here? The decision to not find a reasonable accommodation to interview Kelley seems short sighted and contrary to ensuring the best interests of the schools and our children are given top priority.
“In our view…” who are you speaking for here?
I’ll answer then - not everyone. As for the candidate, I agree that the onus is on her to make it to the meeting. Six other candidates have rearranged their schedules to attend, it is not a requirement to give special consideration. Giving her credentials and resume during public comment was a good idea.