Image

Pittsfield Planning Commission has several matters to discuss at its Feb. 2 meeting.
The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m.
Changes Sought for Proposed Industrial Park
Vanston/O'Brien Inc. is proposing the Reed Industrial Park Site Condominiums development on the northwest corner of Bemis Road and US-23. The property is owned by Bemis Land LLC.
The land, located between the Huron Valley Women's Correctional Facility and US-23, is mostly vacant and has been used recently for farming.
The applicant wants to change the existing planned unit development and court-modified project to expand the list of permitted and conditional uses, change the layout and increase the amount of impervious surface on site. Potential new uses would include self storage, recreational vehicle storage, data processing and computer centers. The applicant also wants to allow private clubs/lodge halls, wireless communication facilities, farm equipment sales/repairs and crematoriums as conditional uses.
Carriage House Resolution
The commission will consider adopting a resolution allowing conditional use permit for a carriage house or "mother-in-law suite" at 7464 Fosdick Road. The applicant is proposing a 768 square-foot detached dwelling.
Changes Proposed to Platt Road Development
Rock Companies is asking for an amendment to the approved site plan for Legends of the Grove - a 250-unit, 16-building development planned for the northeast corner of Morgan and Platt roads.
Changes include:
Site Plan Consideration
Vanston/O'Brien Inc is seeking final site plan approval for Eagle Industrial Park Lot 4, located off Morgan Road, East of Carpenter Road. The property is owned by Maui Properties, LLC.
Plans call for a 24,000 square-foot, $2 million building on the two-acre site that's part of a larger industrial park.
Sunny, with a high of 71 and low of 40 degrees. Sunny in the morning, clear overnight.
No, the motion to approve & adopt was made by Ceo, seconded by Lesch. If you're interested in an unedited/unredacted version of Monday's meeting, the link to the video recording of our budget work session and regular meeting is provided below -
Thank you to those Council members who support the citizens and the Rec Center.
Please note, the rec center now requires 1/3 to almost 1/2 of its operations be funded by the City of Saline taxpayers. Approximately 10% of our City population uses the facility, while 2/3 of the members are non-resident. It’s time the non City residents of the Saline community pays its fair share.
What happened with the funding for the needed repairs at the Recreation Center? With all of the programs and community services provided at the Recreation Center, the nearby communities spending tens of millions of dollars to build new Recreation Centers, and the number of members/high usage for the Center and part
Name all the municipalities of 10,000 people that have their own Rec Center with a pool. I'm generally curious.
Saline Area Schools needs to take over the Rec Center with a Rec creation millage and maybe a short bond issue, too, for improvements.
The mayor and city council love to spend taxpayer dollars frivolously. More and more $$$ into the rec center, that needs to stop. We still don’t have drinkable water and yet the city keeps raising rates. Can’t speak for everyone but I would much rather have clean water than a “lazy river!”
Sorry, Toby Crotty. Do not align to your assessment or thoughts. While nearby communities are spending tens of millions of dollars to build Recreation Centers (because of their value to citizens and communities), Saline is in the fortunate position of already having a very good facility in place which now needs to
You avoided my main point. The rec center is a nice amenity for those that use it. However, it is not a necessity. Clean safe water that we pay exorbitant rates for IS a necessity for EVERYONE!
The unprofessional behavior while in the supposed role of being a journalist when talking to that protester is ridiculous. The incorrect information and “facts” you spewed during the conversation are just par for the course. Thanks for showing up!
I agree with your comments about this journalist. I use the word journalist loosely here, as a journalist should be bringing forth the views of the people they are interviewing, not bringing their obvious bias into every forced conversation.
I understand the right 4 peaceful protests, why expose children to hate and show disrespect to our flag, what is that teaching the children. As a Korean Veteran I oppose anyone disrespecting our countries FLAG, shame on the protesters,