Image
Fans of football were glued to their televisions for the Super Bowl action this weekend, but not before fans of soup celebrated their own competition at the Saline Area Senior Center.
The annual Souper Bowl competition was held on Friday, with local businesses and organizations vying for the title of best soup. A panel of judges made their choices, along with over one hundred visitors who came to the event to sample twenty two soups and vote for their favorites.
This year, the Judges Choice and People’s Choice winner in the category of vegetarian/vegan was Heather Sutton with Life Choices and the entry of Butternut Squash.
“We had great attendance, and met a lot of great people,” said Heather Sutton, executive director of Life Choices/EHM Senior Solutions.
Liberty Club won the Judge’s Choice in the category of Best Hearty Meat with their entry of white chicken chili.
“It was great. This was our first time doing it,” said Shannon Macy, director of Liberty Club. “Our participants of Liberty Club actually did a competition themselves to vote on their favorite chili last month, and that was the recipe we used to submit.”
In addition to the chili, Liberty Club also provided all the football-themed centerpieces for the tables.
“Liberty Club makes the centerpieces for a lot of the senior center’s luncheons, including this souper bowl event. Every year, we bring them back but we trade out all of the flags and decorations for whatever teams are playing in the Super Bowl that year.”
The People’s Choice Award for Best Hearty Meat went to Comfort Keepers of Ann Arbor for their entry of Marry Me Chicken Soup.
“It was a lot bigger than last year, so it’s great. We need more soup flights in life,” said Megan Kenyon, SASC program director. “We had 22 soups to taste.”
For a $5 entry fee, guests were able to try a variety of soups and chilis. Kenyon said that proceeds from the competition will help fund programming at SASC, such as Meals on Wheels and future events and classes.
Saline resident Cheryl Schoen attended the event for the first time last year, and made it a point to come back again this year.
“It’s so much fun to taste all these different soups at one time,” Schoen said. “The senior center has wonderful offerings and friendly people, and these events allow you to get to know more people from your community.”
You lost us at "when I first voted for Trump". No credibility after that.
From someone who likely supported:
* Abusing the justice system to go after opponents
* Suspsended rights during COVID
* Lied about the origin of COVID
* Lied about the treatment of COVID
* Pretended every positive test for a virus was a COVID case
Supported? What an insane leap. Must say somewhat surprised to see you are a supporter of ridiculous conspiracy theories. You are wrong about us and wrong about much of what is on that little list.
Sunny, with a high of 85 and low of 55 degrees. Sunny for the morning, clear overnight.
Appreciate the interest in serving Saline. At this point, looks as though he will win by acclimation. Wonder what would happen if there were more candidates than spots. Without understanding why, it would be difficult to support a candidate who withdrew their interest then popped back in last minute.
As you can see by the picture, Bret is active in the city events and gives countless hours to his community.
Apparently no one can work with the current mayor?
We see that a little differently. Plenty of folks who are working just fine with the current Mayor. Unfortunately, there are others who are small in number yet loud and vocal who seem to delight in spreading unfounded and ridiculous allegations and rumors, and not just regarding the Mayor.
Nice of the attorneys to clarify this language at this point rather than having the foresight to understand that language should never have been in the agreement to start with!
Perhaps the Township should have sought counsel from an attorney not involved in the original contract negotiations (and perhaps they did - do not know) before changing direction.
Final thought - perhaps the attorney(s) working with the Township on the agreement can provide an explanation as to why that language HAD to be as represented in the final version of the agreement/why protections against exactly what has happened were not put in place.