Saline City Councillor Girbach Talks About the Future of the Rec Center, Fire Department

Image

After the recent meeting of Saline City Council, we talked to Dean Girbach, the longest serving member of council, about several issues, including what's next for the study of the Rec Center, the fire department assessment, Acting City Manager Elle Cole and more.

<!-- EMBEDDED YOUTUBE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iGaLnE3d_c -->
More News from Saline
7
I'm interested
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Dan cites large dollar amounts yet much of the support the rec center needs is due to past neglect/lack of support from the city and continual deferral of routine maintenance. Maintenance issues identified as much as 10 or more years ago were repeatedly denied or “decision deferred” by Council and that lack of maintenance has now resulted in some of the higher cost items. Adding insult to injury, the city began diverting CARES funds away from the rec center several years ago further reducing ability to complete needed maintenance. Can’t just remove a significant source of funding, ignore the facility, then turn around and blame facility management for the fact that it has a higher than normal basis of needs now while also criticizing current margins. Additionally, rec centers are rarely if ever profit centers. Research we have done indicates that even for a facility that has not been neglected resulting in additional more costly need, on average 45% of funding is not covered by membership and programs fees. Understand Saline rec center typically has much better margins than that already.

Understand Plante Moran looking at financials from an auditing perspective. Are they really qualified to evaluate operations of a rec center? What experience makes them experts in that area? Will they perform a comparative analysis of the operations and offerings at Saline rec vs. other rec centers?

With the myriad programs the rec center offers, they are MUCH more than just a place to exercise. There are limited to no alternatives to the multiple other programs such as summer camp and kids corner that support local working parents and the multiple other special programs and events through the center. For us, improvements like the lazy river, etc. which are high cost are not necessities. Maintenance and upkeep most certainly are.

Finally, as we have said before, very, very, very difficult to understand the current significant investment in the previously more than adequate senior center (we are active members at both senior and rec centers) which involves items that are well beyond just being nice to haves – much of it is simply unnecessary - while the rec center critical base needs are continually denied. To us, it is simply another example or poor decisions and management by Council, some members of which then turn around and criticize the repeatedly neglected rec center while diverting funds to things that simply are not critical or in many cases not necessary at all.

I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

To name a few:

Flat Rock Michigan 2023 10,239 residents, beautiful fairly new community center with fabulous aquatic center, gym, and other exercise equipment (population under 10K when built, median income lower than Saline as well as lower house values).

Chelsea Michigan 2023 population 5,364 has a very good, new(er) recreation center with pools and a wide range of fitness activities/spaces/equipment/classes.

Dexter Michigan 2023 population4,509 not only has a very good recreation center with pool, gym, and various work out spaces, classes, equipment, etc. They also have a second larger pool at a different location that can also be used for exceptionally low resident cost during specific hours and the village has just invested in new senior center.

And the list goes on as communities are recognizing the importance of these types of facilities to their residents. Also IMPORTANTLY, unlike the other areas, Saline did not have to build an entirely new dedicated facility, which costs tens of millions of dollars, but rather renovated and repurposed a prior school building in 2004 - 21 years ago. So, initial "acquisition cost" was significantly less than other communities that built and maintain their new facilities.

I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Chelsea's is funded by a nonprofit fouundation, not the taxpayers.
Flat Rock tried to sell its Rec Center but there was an effort to save it.
Their effort - which included creating a non-profit to help raise funds for the center - is a work in progress.
There are few towns of 10,000 and lower with a healthy, government funded Rec Center.
The question here is simple: Why should city residents, most of whom have no interest in the Rec Center, fund a facility that serves so many out of town residents?
Somehow, whether it's through the CARES millage or a Recreational Authority, or the county, the Saline Rec Center needs a funding model that takes some burden off city residents.

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

“Adding insult to injury, the city began diverting CARES funds away from the rec center several years ago further reducing ability to complete needed maintenance.” 
This statement is not accurate.  CARES is managed by a separate board that reports to the school board, not the city. Decision were made by the school board during the last renewal to carve out a component for a sinking fund used by the school.

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

No. It's not part of the city. It is a separate legal entity.
I'm not sure exactly what Dean has said, but what I was told was that the Schools reduced the CARES millage as a trade with voters. The schools reduced the CARES Millage and launched the sinking fund millage.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive