Image
Mayor Brian Marl is recommending that City Council establish the Davenport-Curtiss House Working Group.
The group's mission is to provide expert, independent and community-centered leadership in planning for the preservation, activation and long-term stewardship of the Davenport-Curtiss property.
The group is composed of:
Community Development Director Chris Atkin and Treasury Services Coordinator Maike Weberlein will serve as staff liaisons.
Marl, City Manager Dan Swallo, Building Inspector Craig Strong, and Jon Richards (member of the Curtiss-Richards family) will serve as ex officio officers.
Outgoing Deputy City Manager Elle Cole is expected to provide support and guidance, according to Marl's memo to city council.
The city is paying $3.1 million for the property from its general fund balance. Council is expected to consider a motion to pass a resolution to bond for $3.25 million to replenish the general fund.
The working group matter is listed on the meeting's consent agenda.
Her name is MAILE Weberlein.
I’m curious as to why Mr. Marl has announced his reelection intentions, started campaigning and collecting funds, but has not done the paperwork to put his name on the ballot yet?
Marl says he's got his signatures.
Citizens of Saline are finally waking up to all the failures of our current city government. Girbach is bailing (for good reason).
Sunny, with a high of 96 and low of 69 degrees. Sunny for the morning, clear overnight.
Having sadly been involved in the last few years with the care of two family members after loss of their partners then dealing with settling the estates which is far more time consuming and complex than anticipated, can understand this decision and commend him for prioritizing family.
Sounds as if you have been and are a supporter of Swallow and felt he was good for Saline. Nice to hear. As for the other observations, hopefully some of the turnover, including Girbach deciding not to pursue another term (talk about negative), will prove to produce a more positive environment.
If I understand correctly, they are in part attempting to justify the $4.8 to $44 Billion increase (outrageous, unsupportable on any basis) by admitting they did not act in good faith and knowingly understated at $4.8 to control the costs they would incur had they originally provided a realistic, good faith figure.
They are at step Y and we are still at step B. I’m not sure what the play is here, but I’m sure of what the end game is; $0 annual property tax bill for the data centers. Fred Lucas is insanely over his head. The township must seek legal counsel from those who are up to date on everything data centers.