Image
City of Saline Planning Commissioner Dan Carroll wants Saline business owners to understand potential changes to rules governing signs.
The Planning Commission meets Wednesday night at 7 p.m. at City Hall. Among other topics, city planners will consider a new sign ordinance. According to a memo from Community Development Director Chris Atkin, the goal of the ordinance is to remove redundancy, simplify understanding and, most importantly, eliminate language that suggests content.
The process is still early, and the ordinance must be approved by the planning commission and city council before it takes effect.
"I'm not sure about the average resident, but I think the business person should be interested. Signs are one of the best ways of advertising," Carroll said. "The goal is to simplify the sign ordinance. But sometimes, even the smallest change can create something you'd never expect to be in violation. So we want feedback."
He said the planning commission wants to know what people think.
In addition to attending the meeting, the public can watch the video here:
The curious can download the agenda below.
You lost us at "when I first voted for Trump". No credibility after that.
From someone who likely supported:
* Abusing the justice system to go after opponents
* Suspsended rights during COVID
* Lied about the origin of COVID
* Lied about the treatment of COVID
* Pretended every positive test for a virus was a COVID case
Supported? What an insane leap. Must say somewhat surprised to see you are a supporter of ridiculous conspiracy theories. You are wrong about us and wrong about much of what is on that little list.
Sunny, with a high of 88 and low of 63 degrees. Sunny in the morning, clear overnight.
Appreciate the interest in serving Saline. At this point, looks as though he will win by acclimation. Wonder what would happen if there were more candidates than spots. Without understanding why, it would be difficult to support a candidate who withdrew their interest then popped back in last minute.
As you can see by the picture, Bret is active in the city events and gives countless hours to his community.
Apparently no one can work with the current mayor?
We see that a little differently. Plenty of folks who are working just fine with the current Mayor. Unfortunately, there are others who are small in number yet loud and vocal who seem to delight in spreading unfounded and ridiculous allegations and rumors, and not just regarding the Mayor.
Nice of the attorneys to clarify this language at this point rather than having the foresight to understand that language should never have been in the agreement to start with!
Perhaps the Township should have sought counsel from an attorney not involved in the original contract negotiations (and perhaps they did - do not know) before changing direction.
Final thought - perhaps the attorney(s) working with the Township on the agreement can provide an explanation as to why that language HAD to be as represented in the final version of the agreement/why protections against exactly what has happened were not put in place.