Image
Could Saline soon have its first cannabis retailer?
Visio Clara is the real estate holding company for Lume Cannabis Co., which has 30 retail outlets in Michigan and 11 more in the works. Officials from Visio Clara and Lume Cannabis Co. will speak for Saline City Council Monday about their interest on Lot 20A - the city-owned vacant parcel on Michigan Avenue between Zippy Auto Wash and the Oaks Shopping Plaza.

The company has sent a non-binding letter of intent to realtor Tony Caprarese, who has been the city's broker for most of its land sales over the last eight years. The letter of intent serves as a proposal to purchase the 6.54-acre parcel.
The letter of intent included in the public agenda packet does not show a proposed price for the property. The real estate listing shows the city seeks $817,500 for the property.
According to the letter, Visio Clara plans to build the cannabis store on Michigan Avenue and then work with brokers to help develop the back of the parcel.
At the moment, the city does not permit recreational marijuana business but the city's Code Review Task Force, at the direction of city council, is working on a new ordinance that would regular such business.
GBA Development had a purchase and development agreement that would have been worth $817,500 - however, GBA's plans for the property continued to shift as the property sat empty, so the city chose not to extend the agreement.
The city also spoke with IHA about buying the property, but that deal fell through, reportedly, because the IHA was not willing to agree with the city's request to develop an urgent care clinic on the property.
The council meeting begins at 7 p.m., Monday.
Overcast , with a high of 41 and low of 33 degrees. Mist for the morning, overcast during the afternoon, fog in the evening, overcast overnight.
Disagree with Dillon's assessment of Girbach and relieved that Council voted otherwise regarding appointments.
Denial of maintenance is a bit of a canard.
Girbach and Dillon and many other were under the understanding that the most recent "study" of the feasibility of the Rec Center was exactly that. Instead, they were given a report that was nothing but a "if you build it, they will come" request for money.
Disagree with your assessments. That said, if you believe the process was flawed well . . . . perhaps, again, you should be looking at Girbach as he was involved in the process (don't know what, if any other Council members were).
Why are some of the players bowing their heads?
Why are some wearing different color shoes?
Wondering what happened with Thorncest lawsuits brought against the previous owner and search for contacts with the new owners. Seems there was a court date set in November or December?