Image

York Township is holding an open house from 7-8:30 p.m., Thursday, Jan. 11, to discuss plans for a non-motorized trail,
The meeting will be held at York Township Hall, 11560 Stony Creek Road, Milan.
Bill Cook is chair of the York Township non-motorized transportation subcommittee.
"Our committee has been trying to navigate the process of installing a bike path along Willis Road, and then down to Bemis, to connect what Pittsfield is building," Cook said.
Cook said the township is still in the early stages. The township conducted a nonmotorized connectivity study in 2021. Since then, the nonmotorized transportation subcommittee has been working on the plan.
The township will explain some options and goals at Thursday's open house. It will also seek feedback from the public.
"There's a lot of excitement from residents who want a path, like the paths Pittsfield has built, to connect to Saline, or to connect to Pittsfield's paths and the Ann Arbor system. But there may also be concerns from residents. Digging around in someone's yard might cause consternation. We want to make sure people's voices are heard," Cook said. "All residents are welcome to attend."
Plans are very preliminary at the moment. There are no designs, timetables, or concrete cost estimates. Cook said the township wants to emulate its neighbor to the north. Pittsfield Township used many government grants to fund its trail network and limit the burden on local taxpayers.
Cook said the committee has identified Willis Road as the first phase of the trail project. 60 percent of York Township lives off of Willis Road or in a subdivision that can be accessed from Willis Road, Cook said.
"It's a main artery in the township," Cook said.
The 2021 study estimated 4.6-mile project would cost $2.2 million.
A Willis Road trail would allow runners and cyclists to connect with Saline or the Pittsfield trails (if it was connected down Platt Road to Bemis). It would also connect to Sandra Richardson Park and to the Toyota R&D center
There are also preliminary plans for connecting to Milan via Platt and Carpenter Roads in phases two and three. The Carpenter Road plan doesn't provide the same desired connections and would require retrofitting the Willis Road bridge.
Partly Cloudy , with a high of 63 and low of 39 degrees. Sunny in the morning, cloudy overnight.
No, the motion to approve & adopt was made by Ceo, seconded by Lesch. If you're interested in an unedited/unredacted version of Monday's meeting, the link to the video recording of our budget work session and regular meeting is provided below -
Thank you to those Council members who support the citizens and the Rec Center.
Please note, the rec center now requires 1/3 to almost 1/2 of its operations be funded by the City of Saline taxpayers. Approximately 10% of our City population uses the facility, while 2/3 of the members are non-resident. It’s time the non City residents of the Saline community pays its fair share.
What happened with the funding for the needed repairs at the Recreation Center? With all of the programs and community services provided at the Recreation Center, the nearby communities spending tens of millions of dollars to build new Recreation Centers, and the number of members/high usage for the Center and part
The mayor and city council love to spend taxpayer dollars frivolously. More and more $$$ into the rec center, that needs to stop. We still don’t have drinkable water and yet the city keeps raising rates. Can’t speak for everyone but I would much rather have clean water than a “lazy river!”
Sorry, Toby Crotty. Do not align to your assessment or thoughts. While nearby communities are spending tens of millions of dollars to build Recreation Centers (because of their value to citizens and communities), Saline is in the fortunate position of already having a very good facility in place which now needs to
You avoided my main point. The rec center is a nice amenity for those that use it. However, it is not a necessity. Clean safe water that we pay exorbitant rates for IS a necessity for EVERYONE!
The unprofessional behavior while in the supposed role of being a journalist when talking to that protester is ridiculous. The incorrect information and “facts” you spewed during the conversation are just par for the course. Thanks for showing up!
I agree with your comments about this journalist. I use the word journalist loosely here, as a journalist should be bringing forth the views of the people they are interviewing, not bringing their obvious bias into every forced conversation.
I understand the right 4 peaceful protests, why expose children to hate and show disrespect to our flag, what is that teaching the children. As a Korean Veteran I oppose anyone disrespecting our countries FLAG, shame on the protesters,