So many incorrect statements in this article. First, the Superintendent job posting is already up. The document they were discussing at the meeting contains specific requirements and preferences for the position and will be attached to the current post.
Second, the survey results indicate what the community think is most important in a superintendent-and one who is proficient with budget planning and curriculum development was obviously important.
That does NOT mean there are “issues” in these areas; it means these are important job criteria.
The correct language was someone who will “continue the direction of the current administration but who can make some necessary changes.”
That does not suggest an “appetite for change;” the word SOME clearly indicates few changes. The entire first part of the question indicates that the community is happy with the direction of the administration, and wants some issues addressed by the new superintendent.
“…don't expect to hear much in the Saline Area Schools search for a new superintendent for a little while.”
“Bennett said the board members shouldn't expect to hear much from him over the next few weeks….He said he would post the opening as soon as Wednesday.”
You keep adding your own opinions that there will be no movement on the posting, including that Mr. Bennett won’t be heard from for weeks - yet the ADDITION to the post (again, it’s already up) will be added by Wednesday.
You add inflammatory rhetoric designed to rile people up instead of presenting facts. You seem to be incapable of keeping your personal opinions and biases out of your “reporting.”