Image
Tuesday night, the Saline Board of Education voted 6-0 on a motion to have President Michael McVey negotiate to spend up to $12,000 with Scott Robertson to conduct the third-party review of Saline's athletic department.
Robertson owns 53 Athletic Consulting.
McVey will also negotiate with Robertson to refine the scope of the review.
The district received three bids for the job. The ad hoc committee of Michael McVey, Tim Austin and Lauren Gold interviewed all three bidders over the internet.
Consultants Scott Garvis, Scott Robertson and Amy Gibbs submitted proposals and CVs.
Trustee Austin said he favored going with Robertson. Trustee Brad Gerbe said he didn't like the cost associated with Garvis, who is from Iowa, and he didn't see much athletics expertise from Gibbs. He said he thought Robertson would have the most credibility with the school athletics community.
Gerbe also suggested going with a motion that allowed a board member to negotiate with the top candidate. Austin concurred and suggested a motion to have McVey negotiate with Gibbs, refining some of the tasks and lowering the price. Trustee Jennifer Steben agreed. Trustee Darcy Berwick was put off by the price considering the $9,000 being spent on the superintendent search.
The board capped the price at $12,000.
Earlier in the meeting, Steben had asked McVey if the committee narrowed the scope to reduce costs. McVey said he hadn't but expects the board to do that as the process continues.
"We talked to all of them and said they said 'we are prepared to narrow it down' if required," McVey said.
Students and parents demanded a review of the athletic department after the football team was forced to forfeit three games due to using a player who no longer lived in the district.
The previous board voted 4-3, against the wishes of Superintendent Steve Laatsch, for the review. Laatsch then soon after announced his retirement.
Robertson was Athletic Director at Grand Haven from 2014-23 and serves on the Athletic Director Connection Program Mentor program within the MHSAA.
Whitmer is simply wrong on this one. The data centers are neither a benefit nor desired by local residents. That should be all that needs to be said. Two people/entities will benefit - the landowner receiving the windfall payment and DTE. The rest of us will pay a very heavy and undesired price for their gains.
Not all residents are against it. Private land sold by the owners will of course benefit them, it is supposed to. An entire community trying to dictate who they can sell their property to, for aesthetic reasons of a “farming community,” is ridiculous.
Here's the thing, Libby. Most of these land grabs require rezoning that conflicts with the Master Plan developed by elected officials and reflective of the wishes of others who have invested in and live in the community.
Light freezing rain, with a high of 32 and low of 22 degrees. Overcast for the morning, light freezing rain for the afternoon, cloudy during the evening, clear overnight.
Improve rates? Improve for who?
Please, someone explain how saline rates are so much higher than surrounding areas.
Because we have a dysfunctional city Government! That’s why.
Just one of the MANY family events the Recreation Center provides! When he is not hosting as Santa, this wonderful gentleman is also a fabulous adult water aerobics instructor and teaches swim lessons to the kiddos.
Wow! Just got an email saying my post pointing out that the Santa event is one of many family activities at the Rec Center and that the gentleman who hosts as Santa also teaches water aerobics and kid swim classes is flagged as offensive. Guess compliments and enthusiasm are not welcome at the Saline Post?